Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of such notice for the assessment order, therefore, the order in levying penalty under section 271(1)(b) is invalid. - Furthermore, hen assessee itself offered additional income, which was debited on account of interest on TDS and the same was accepted by AO. And no other issue was identified nor was any other addition made in the assessment order, no penalty should be levied - AT
Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of such notice for the assessment order, therefore, the order in levying penalty under section 271(1)(b) is invalid. - Furthermore, hen assessee itself offered additional income, which was debited on account of interest on TDS and the same was accepted by AO. And no other issue was identified nor was any other addition made in the assessment order, no penalty should be levied - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
