Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of such notice for the assessment order, therefore, the order in levying penalty under section 271(1)(b) is invalid. - Furthermore, hen assessee itself offered additional income, which was debited on account of interest on TDS and the same was accepted by AO. And no other issue was identified nor was any other addition made in the assessment order, no penalty should be levied - AT
Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of such notice for the assessment order, therefore, the order in levying penalty under section 271(1)(b) is invalid. - Furthermore, hen assessee itself offered additional income, which was debited on account of interest on TDS and the same was accepted by AO. And no other issue was identified nor was any other addition made in the assessment order, no penalty should be levied - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
