Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of such notice for the assessment order, therefore, the order in levying penalty under section 271(1)(b) is invalid. - Furthermore, hen assessee itself offered additional income, which was debited on account of interest on TDS and the same was accepted by AO. And no other issue was identified nor was any other addition made in the assessment order, no penalty should be levied - AT
Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of such notice for the assessment order, therefore, the order in levying penalty under section 271(1)(b) is invalid. - Furthermore, hen assessee itself offered additional income, which was debited on account of interest on TDS and the same was accepted by AO. And no other issue was identified nor was any other addition made in the assessment order, no penalty should be levied - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
