Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
TP Adjustment - upward adjustment under the provisions of section 92 - ALP determination - The amount of depreciation claimed by the assessee in the ratio of turnover stands at 9.366% whereas average ratio of depreciation of the comparable companies claimed to their turnover stands at 2.086%. Thus it is inferred that the adjustments in the depreciation is required to be made. Now, the issue arises how to make the adjustments. In this regard we find that there is no guidelines or the provisions of law providing the mechanism for making the adjustments with respect to the depreciation. - AO should have taken the PBDIT as the profit level indicator while working out the arm length price with respect to the international transactions carried out by the assessee with its AE - AT
TP Adjustment - upward adjustment under the provisions of section 92 - ALP determination - The amount of depreciation claimed by the assessee in the ratio of turnover stands at 9.366% whereas average ratio of depreciation of the comparable companies claimed to their turnover stands at 2.086%. Thus it is inferred that the adjustments in the depreciation is required to be made. Now, the issue arises how to make the adjustments. In this regard we find that there is no guidelines or the provisions of law providing the mechanism for making the adjustments with respect to the depreciation. - AO should have taken the PBDIT as the profit level indicator while working out the arm length price with respect to the international transactions carried out by the assessee with its AE - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
