Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Addition for sale of sarki khalli - as alleged assessee has not having any such stock - Goods were received 10 days prior from 17.2.2010 by Poonam Road Lines. So the assessee had stock of sarki khalli as on 17.2.2010 but since the bill was entered on 27.2.2010 there was a negative stock appearing in the quantitative details. The negative stock appeared since the Accountant entered the stock on 28.2.2010. Has it been made on 27.2.2010 there would have been no negative stock. This fact is discernable from the paper book. Thus in our considered view this is not a discrepancy and no addition was called for on account of sales without stock in hand. - AT
Addition for sale of sarki khalli - as alleged assessee has not having any such stock - Goods were received 10 days prior from 17.2.2010 by Poonam Road Lines. So the assessee had stock of sarki khalli as on 17.2.2010 but since the bill was entered on 27.2.2010 there was a negative stock appearing in the quantitative details. The negative stock appeared since the Accountant entered the stock on 28.2.2010. Has it been made on 27.2.2010 there would have been no negative stock. This fact is discernable from the paper book. Thus in our considered view this is not a discrepancy and no addition was called for on account of sales without stock in hand. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
