Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reversal of Cenvat Credit - There are no merits in the confirmation of demand. Though in the Order in Original as well as in the first appellate authority’s order, the department has discussed that the appellant has not put forward evidence to show that they had intimated the department as to the reversal of credit, there is no allegation in the Show Cause Notice that the appellant has not complied with the procedure of intimating the department as required under Rule 6(3A) of CENVAT Credit Rules. - AT
Reversal of Cenvat Credit - There are no merits in the confirmation of demand. Though in the Order in Original as well as in the first appellate authority’s order, the department has discussed that the appellant has not put forward evidence to show that they had intimated the department as to the reversal of credit, there is no allegation in the Show Cause Notice that the appellant has not complied with the procedure of intimating the department as required under Rule 6(3A) of CENVAT Credit Rules. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
