Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
TDS u/s 195 - Since the Singapore HO recovered the same amount from the Indian BO as was incurred by it to third parties without any profit element, the receipt cannot be construed as “other sum chargeable under the provisions of this Act” so as to warrant deduction of tax at source u/s.195 of the Act by the Indian BO. Once it is held that TDS was not necessary, there can be no question of disallowance u/s.40(a)(i). - AT
TDS u/s 195 - Since the Singapore HO recovered the same amount from the Indian BO as was incurred by it to third parties without any profit element, the receipt cannot be construed as “other sum chargeable under the provisions of this Act” so as to warrant deduction of tax at source u/s.195 of the Act by the Indian BO. Once it is held that TDS was not necessary, there can be no question of disallowance u/s.40(a)(i). - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
