Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Levy of Compounding Fee - detention of goods - The first respondent has not recorded as to why the documents produced by the appellant cannot be accepted. If any clarification is required, the same could have been called for. Therefore, it is clear that the compounding notice dated 13.3.2016 is not only a non-speaking notice, but a notice in violation of the principles of natural justice, as the grounds raised by the appellant have not been considered by the first respondent - HC
Levy of Compounding Fee - detention of goods - The first respondent has not recorded as to why the documents produced by the appellant cannot be accepted. If any clarification is required, the same could have been called for. Therefore, it is clear that the compounding notice dated 13.3.2016 is not only a non-speaking notice, but a notice in violation of the principles of natural justice, as the grounds raised by the appellant have not been considered by the first respondent - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
