Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the I.T. Act, it would strengthen the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) that assessee made a request before A.O. that original return filed may be treated as return filed in response to notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961. Since no notice under section 143(2) have been issued by the A.O. before completion of the assessment within the period of limitation, therefore, the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in quashing the re-assessment proceedings. - AT
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the I.T. Act, it would strengthen the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) that assessee made a request before A.O. that original return filed may be treated as return filed in response to notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961. Since no notice under section 143(2) have been issued by the A.O. before completion of the assessment within the period of limitation, therefore, the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in quashing the re-assessment proceedings. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
