Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Attribution of 15% Revenue to the PE in India - invocation of Rule 27 for challenging the decision of the CIT (A) - Since no guidelines are available as to how much should income be reasonably attributable to India, the same has to be determined on the basis of the facts of the case and judicial precedents. - the ld. CIT(A) rightly attributed 15% of the Revenue - AT
Attribution of 15% Revenue to the PE in India - invocation of Rule 27 for challenging the decision of the CIT (A) - Since no guidelines are available as to how much should income be reasonably attributable to India, the same has to be determined on the basis of the facts of the case and judicial precedents. - the ld. CIT(A) rightly attributed 15% of the Revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
