Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Revision u/s 263 - This is also not a case where the Commissioner failed to undertake inquiry in the course of the exercise of revisional jurisdiction. It is only in pursuance to such inquiry that the Commissioner recorded a categorical finding that the assessee had not even claimed any fees in respect of any alleged technical or management services rendered by it. This is not a case of some plausible view but this is a case where the decision was a result of non-application of mind to the materials on record. - ITAT was not justified in interfering with the CIT's order - HC
Revision u/s 263 - This is also not a case where the Commissioner failed to undertake inquiry in the course of the exercise of revisional jurisdiction. It is only in pursuance to such inquiry that the Commissioner recorded a categorical finding that the assessee had not even claimed any fees in respect of any alleged technical or management services rendered by it. This is not a case of some plausible view but this is a case where the decision was a result of non-application of mind to the materials on record. - ITAT was not justified in interfering with the CIT's order - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.