Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Entitled to claim deduction u/s 10 (10 C) (viii) and also under Section 89 (1) - amounts received as part of VRS - claim came to be rejected on the basis of the instructions/letter issued by the CBDT - when the proceedings are found to be without jurisdiction the existence of an alternative remedy is not a bar for granting relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It becomes our duty to grant relief when we are convinced that the proceedings are without jurisdiction.- HC
Entitled to claim deduction u/s 10 (10 C) (viii) and also under Section 89 (1) - amounts received as part of VRS - claim came to be rejected on the basis of the instructions/letter issued by the CBDT - when the proceedings are found to be without jurisdiction the existence of an alternative remedy is not a bar for granting relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It becomes our duty to grant relief when we are convinced that the proceedings are without jurisdiction.- HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.