Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Profiteering - purchase of Shop - the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 5.91% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to June, 2019 - It is also apparent from the above that the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as he has not passed on the benefit of ITC to his buyers. - NAPA
Profiteering - purchase of Shop - the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 5.91% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to June, 2019 - It is also apparent from the above that the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as he has not passed on the benefit of ITC to his buyers. - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.