Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2981 to 3000 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Profiteering - purchase of Shop - the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 5.91% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to June, 2019 - It is also apparent from the above that the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as he has not passed on the benefit of ITC to his buyers. - NAPA
Profiteering - purchase of Shop - the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 5.91% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to June, 2019 - It is also apparent from the above that the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as he has not passed on the benefit of ITC to his buyers. - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.