Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition of contingent liability, which do not constitute expenditure and not allowable u/s 37 (1) - The assessee Board does not have any domain or control on this issue. It is the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gases which advises the Board about the payment of royalty to the respective State Governments which is evident from the letters produced by the Assessee Board during the Assessment Proceedings and the appellate proceedings. Thus, the CIT(A) has rightly deleted the said addition - AT
Addition of contingent liability, which do not constitute expenditure and not allowable u/s 37 (1) - The assessee Board does not have any domain or control on this issue. It is the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gases which advises the Board about the payment of royalty to the respective State Governments which is evident from the letters produced by the Assessee Board during the Assessment Proceedings and the appellate proceedings. Thus, the CIT(A) has rightly deleted the said addition - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
