Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Unconditional clearance of imported goods - It is glaring to the naked eye that the respondents have committed two illegalities. First illegality is they have detained the goods without affecting seizure. Secondly, they have exceeded the time limit for detention of the goods even if it is construed to be a case of seizure. In such circumstances, the impugned action cannot at all be justified - Respondents are directed to forthwith release the imported goods of the petitioner - HC
Unconditional clearance of imported goods - It is glaring to the naked eye that the respondents have committed two illegalities. First illegality is they have detained the goods without affecting seizure. Secondly, they have exceeded the time limit for detention of the goods even if it is construed to be a case of seizure. In such circumstances, the impugned action cannot at all be justified - Respondents are directed to forthwith release the imported goods of the petitioner - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
