Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether the assessee is correct in discharging service tax on gross amount charged under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 after availing CENVAT credit on inputs or whether they have to pay service tax under Rule 2A(ii)(B) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules 2006 as assessed by the department? - the discharge of service tax liability at full rate by the appellant by applying the provisions of section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be called in question by the Revenue - AT
Whether the assessee is correct in discharging service tax on gross amount charged under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 after availing CENVAT credit on inputs or whether they have to pay service tax under Rule 2A(ii)(B) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules 2006 as assessed by the department? - the discharge of service tax liability at full rate by the appellant by applying the provisions of section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be called in question by the Revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
