Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 and 69C - It is neither the AO’s case that the loan creditors are not income-tax assessee’s nor has he alleged that the documents and evidences furnished by the appellant in support of loan transactions were false or suffered from defects or do not tally with the Department’s records. - Aggregate additions being principal loan amount received by the appellant from the fifteen bodies corporate did not constitute its income chargeable u/s 68 of the Act. - AT
Addition u/s 68 and 69C - It is neither the AO’s case that the loan creditors are not income-tax assessee’s nor has he alleged that the documents and evidences furnished by the appellant in support of loan transactions were false or suffered from defects or do not tally with the Department’s records. - Aggregate additions being principal loan amount received by the appellant from the fifteen bodies corporate did not constitute its income chargeable u/s 68 of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.