Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Addition u/s. 40(a)(ia) r.w. 195 - The rendition of services for earning commission cannot be of such a nature that there is a transfer of technology, in the sense it is required to fulfil the 'make available' clause in the Indo UK DTAA. - even if the commission income in the hands of the recipient is taxable under the provisions of Section 9, the provisions of the Indo UK DTAA will come to the rescue of the assessee. - AT
Addition u/s. 40(a)(ia) r.w. 195 - The rendition of services for earning commission cannot be of such a nature that there is a transfer of technology, in the sense it is required to fulfil the 'make available' clause in the Indo UK DTAA. - even if the commission income in the hands of the recipient is taxable under the provisions of Section 9, the provisions of the Indo UK DTAA will come to the rescue of the assessee. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.