Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Commission expenses paid to its holding company - Whether such payments were at arm's length or were for business expediency? - Revenue has accepted the identical expenses incurred by the assessee in the other assessment years - The disallowance was made on account of non-deduction of TDS under section 195 of the Act. Thus it can be inferred that the question of arm length and business expediency does not arise in the given facts and circumstances. - AT
Commission expenses paid to its holding company - Whether such payments were at arm's length or were for business expediency? - Revenue has accepted the identical expenses incurred by the assessee in the other assessment years - The disallowance was made on account of non-deduction of TDS under section 195 of the Act. Thus it can be inferred that the question of arm length and business expediency does not arise in the given facts and circumstances. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
