Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Commission expenses paid to its holding company - Whether such payments were at arm's length or were for business expediency? - Revenue has accepted the identical expenses incurred by the assessee in the other assessment years - The disallowance was made on account of non-deduction of TDS under section 195 of the Act. Thus it can be inferred that the question of arm length and business expediency does not arise in the given facts and circumstances. - AT
Commission expenses paid to its holding company - Whether such payments were at arm's length or were for business expediency? - Revenue has accepted the identical expenses incurred by the assessee in the other assessment years - The disallowance was made on account of non-deduction of TDS under section 195 of the Act. Thus it can be inferred that the question of arm length and business expediency does not arise in the given facts and circumstances. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
