Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Deduction u/s 80IB - Whether Ld.CIT(A) can re-estimate average profit @ 38.40%? - The powers given to assessing officer under sub-section 8 of section 80IA or 80IA(10) should not be used to restrict the benefit given to assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Act, as schemes of these sections are different. We also note that the Assessing Officer has estimated the assessee’s average profit @16.02%. On appeal, Ld.CIT(A) reestimated the assessee’s average profit @38.40% and computed the eligible amount of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act, without rejecting books of accounts. - AT
Deduction u/s 80IB - Whether Ld.CIT(A) can re-estimate average profit @ 38.40%? - The powers given to assessing officer under sub-section 8 of section 80IA or 80IA(10) should not be used to restrict the benefit given to assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Act, as schemes of these sections are different. We also note that the Assessing Officer has estimated the assessee’s average profit @16.02%. On appeal, Ld.CIT(A) reestimated the assessee’s average profit @38.40% and computed the eligible amount of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act, without rejecting books of accounts. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.