Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Deduction u/s 80IB - Whether Ld.CIT(A) can re-estimate average profit @ 38.40%? - The powers given to assessing officer under sub-section 8 of section 80IA or 80IA(10) should not be used to restrict the benefit given to assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Act, as schemes of these sections are different. We also note that the Assessing Officer has estimated the assessee’s average profit @16.02%. On appeal, Ld.CIT(A) reestimated the assessee’s average profit @38.40% and computed the eligible amount of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act, without rejecting books of accounts. - AT
Deduction u/s 80IB - Whether Ld.CIT(A) can re-estimate average profit @ 38.40%? - The powers given to assessing officer under sub-section 8 of section 80IA or 80IA(10) should not be used to restrict the benefit given to assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Act, as schemes of these sections are different. We also note that the Assessing Officer has estimated the assessee’s average profit @16.02%. On appeal, Ld.CIT(A) reestimated the assessee’s average profit @38.40% and computed the eligible amount of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act, without rejecting books of accounts. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
