Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Deduction u/s 80IB - Whether Ld.CIT(A) can re-estimate average profit @ 38.40%? - The powers given to assessing officer under sub-section 8 of section 80IA or 80IA(10) should not be used to restrict the benefit given to assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Act, as schemes of these sections are different. We also note that the Assessing Officer has estimated the assessee’s average profit @16.02%. On appeal, Ld.CIT(A) reestimated the assessee’s average profit @38.40% and computed the eligible amount of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act, without rejecting books of accounts. - AT
Deduction u/s 80IB - Whether Ld.CIT(A) can re-estimate average profit @ 38.40%? - The powers given to assessing officer under sub-section 8 of section 80IA or 80IA(10) should not be used to restrict the benefit given to assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Act, as schemes of these sections are different. We also note that the Assessing Officer has estimated the assessee’s average profit @16.02%. On appeal, Ld.CIT(A) reestimated the assessee’s average profit @38.40% and computed the eligible amount of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act, without rejecting books of accounts. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.