Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Revision u/s 263 - the notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act, was issued much prior to the assessee filing his return of income. This is not in accordance with law. Hence the order passed u/s. 148 of the Act without issuing valid notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act, makes the reassessment order dt. 20/05/2016, passed u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Act, bad in law - Consequently, the revision of the assessment u/s. 263, revising such illegal assessment order is also bad in law. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - the notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act, was issued much prior to the assessee filing his return of income. This is not in accordance with law. Hence the order passed u/s. 148 of the Act without issuing valid notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act, makes the reassessment order dt. 20/05/2016, passed u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Act, bad in law - Consequently, the revision of the assessment u/s. 263, revising such illegal assessment order is also bad in law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.