Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Penalty u/s.271D - there is no estopel against the statute and therefore, it is open to the assessee to claim before the authorities that a particular item of income is not taxable despite having offered the same in its return of income or even having accepted the same as taxable before the authorities or even in the books of accounts - This appeal filed by the assessee against penalty u/s.271D of the Act for A.Y.2007-08 requires to be remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for denovo adjudication in accordance with law. - AT
Penalty u/s.271D - there is no estopel against the statute and therefore, it is open to the assessee to claim before the authorities that a particular item of income is not taxable despite having offered the same in its return of income or even having accepted the same as taxable before the authorities or even in the books of accounts - This appeal filed by the assessee against penalty u/s.271D of the Act for A.Y.2007-08 requires to be remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for denovo adjudication in accordance with law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
