Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service of copy of order u/s 169 - Confiscation of goods alongwith vehicle - goods were not accompanied by the requisite E-way Bill-01 - s per section 169 of UPGST Act, it is clear that service on the driver would not fall within any of the category specified from the Clause a to f of Section 169 (1) of the Act. - The order impugned in the present writ petition is wholly arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the mandate of Section 169 of the Act - HC
Service of copy of order u/s 169 - Confiscation of goods alongwith vehicle - goods were not accompanied by the requisite E-way Bill-01 - s per section 169 of UPGST Act, it is clear that service on the driver would not fall within any of the category specified from the Clause a to f of Section 169 (1) of the Act. - The order impugned in the present writ petition is wholly arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the mandate of Section 169 of the Act - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.