Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The allegation of suppressing the facts from the department does not hold good in the event of periodic audit of both the appellant assessees. There is no other evidence in the impugned order to show that the appellants have willfully suppressed the facts from the department in order to evade payment of duty. As such extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in the present case - AT
Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The allegation of suppressing the facts from the department does not hold good in the event of periodic audit of both the appellant assessees. There is no other evidence in the impugned order to show that the appellants have willfully suppressed the facts from the department in order to evade payment of duty. As such extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in the present case - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
