Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Confiscation of goods - proceeding simultaneously u/s 129 & 130 - except arguing that the authorities cannot invoke both the sections simultaneously, the petitioners have not produced any case law which militates against the views expressed in the above judgment. - While interpreting the Tax Statutes and applying to the facts and holding that the provisions thereof are violated, the authorities must give cogent reasons. Unfortunately, in the instant case, the reasons, are a casualty - the impugned order does not stand to legal scrutiny and liable to be set aside. - HC
Confiscation of goods - proceeding simultaneously u/s 129 & 130 - except arguing that the authorities cannot invoke both the sections simultaneously, the petitioners have not produced any case law which militates against the views expressed in the above judgment. - While interpreting the Tax Statutes and applying to the facts and holding that the provisions thereof are violated, the authorities must give cogent reasons. Unfortunately, in the instant case, the reasons, are a casualty - the impugned order does not stand to legal scrutiny and liable to be set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.