Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Confiscation of goods - proceeding simultaneously u/s 129 & 130 - except arguing that the authorities cannot invoke both the sections simultaneously, the petitioners have not produced any case law which militates against the views expressed in the above judgment. - While interpreting the Tax Statutes and applying to the facts and holding that the provisions thereof are violated, the authorities must give cogent reasons. Unfortunately, in the instant case, the reasons, are a casualty - the impugned order does not stand to legal scrutiny and liable to be set aside. - HC
Confiscation of goods - proceeding simultaneously u/s 129 & 130 - except arguing that the authorities cannot invoke both the sections simultaneously, the petitioners have not produced any case law which militates against the views expressed in the above judgment. - While interpreting the Tax Statutes and applying to the facts and holding that the provisions thereof are violated, the authorities must give cogent reasons. Unfortunately, in the instant case, the reasons, are a casualty - the impugned order does not stand to legal scrutiny and liable to be set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.