Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - claim of interest expenditure - The companies GIL and CNIL are subsidiary companies, which clearly indicates that the investment made by the assessee company in other sister concerns rather we can say subsidiary companies are meant to be for commercial expediency and commercial necessity. - the investment made by the assessee are for its commercial purposes hence the interest expenditure borne by the assessee for the investment made by the assessee on its subsidiary company are allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. - AT
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - claim of interest expenditure - The companies GIL and CNIL are subsidiary companies, which clearly indicates that the investment made by the assessee company in other sister concerns rather we can say subsidiary companies are meant to be for commercial expediency and commercial necessity. - the investment made by the assessee are for its commercial purposes hence the interest expenditure borne by the assessee for the investment made by the assessee on its subsidiary company are allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
