Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - claim of interest expenditure - The companies GIL and CNIL are subsidiary companies, which clearly indicates that the investment made by the assessee company in other sister concerns rather we can say subsidiary companies are meant to be for commercial expediency and commercial necessity. - the investment made by the assessee are for its commercial purposes hence the interest expenditure borne by the assessee for the investment made by the assessee on its subsidiary company are allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. - AT
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - claim of interest expenditure - The companies GIL and CNIL are subsidiary companies, which clearly indicates that the investment made by the assessee company in other sister concerns rather we can say subsidiary companies are meant to be for commercial expediency and commercial necessity. - the investment made by the assessee are for its commercial purposes hence the interest expenditure borne by the assessee for the investment made by the assessee on its subsidiary company are allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
