Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Validity of appeal preferred by the respondent (revenue) against an order of assessment under the Finance Act, 1994 - amnesty scheme in vogue - The petitioner cannot also be seen as prejudiced in any manner merely because the intimation of the revenue appeal was received by him after the expiry of the amnesty scheme. His option for the amnesty scheme was not dependent upon whether or not the revenue preferred an appeal against the order of the assessing authority. The petitioner has not made out a case for the reliefs sought for in the writ petition. - HC
Validity of appeal preferred by the respondent (revenue) against an order of assessment under the Finance Act, 1994 - amnesty scheme in vogue - The petitioner cannot also be seen as prejudiced in any manner merely because the intimation of the revenue appeal was received by him after the expiry of the amnesty scheme. His option for the amnesty scheme was not dependent upon whether or not the revenue preferred an appeal against the order of the assessing authority. The petitioner has not made out a case for the reliefs sought for in the writ petition. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
