Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
