Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
