Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
