Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Condonation of delay of 201 days - It is well settled principle in Law that if the ‘explanation’ offered does not smack of mala fide, utmost consideration must be given to a Litigant/Suitor to condone the delay. - This Tribunal, to prevent an ‘Aberration of Justice’ and to ‘Secure the Ends of Justice’ interferes with the impugned order passed by the NCLT, Division Bench -I, Chennai and allows the instant Appeal by condoning the delay in question. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
