Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Cognizance for the offence u/s 276C(1) - enquiry by the investigation wing - unusual credit of large amount through RTGS in bank account maintained by the petitioner and funds were debited for investment in the stock market - There is no requirement under the Act that the assessment proceedings should be completed before lunching prosecution. Respondent has rightly lodged the complaint as against the petitioner for the offences u/s 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - HC
Cognizance for the offence u/s 276C(1) - enquiry by the investigation wing - unusual credit of large amount through RTGS in bank account maintained by the petitioner and funds were debited for investment in the stock market - There is no requirement under the Act that the assessment proceedings should be completed before lunching prosecution. Respondent has rightly lodged the complaint as against the petitioner for the offences u/s 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
