Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Cognizance for the offence u/s 276C(1) - enquiry by the investigation wing - unusual credit of large amount through RTGS in bank account maintained by the petitioner and funds were debited for investment in the stock market - There is no requirement under the Act that the assessment proceedings should be completed before lunching prosecution. Respondent has rightly lodged the complaint as against the petitioner for the offences u/s 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - HC
Cognizance for the offence u/s 276C(1) - enquiry by the investigation wing - unusual credit of large amount through RTGS in bank account maintained by the petitioner and funds were debited for investment in the stock market - There is no requirement under the Act that the assessment proceedings should be completed before lunching prosecution. Respondent has rightly lodged the complaint as against the petitioner for the offences u/s 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
