Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Insolvency and BankruptcyNovember 7, 2020Case LawsAT
Refund of amount which had been adjusted during CIRP by the Appellant Bank from Fixed Deposits - Once CIRP was initiated and Section 14 of IBC applied such adjustment by Appellant cannot be maintained. Lack of knowledge of initiation of CIRP would not be relevant. When CIRP was initiated, the Appellant Bank could not have adjusted the amounts as has been done in this matter. - AT
Refund of amount which had been adjusted during CIRP by the Appellant Bank from Fixed Deposits - Once CIRP was initiated and Section 14 of IBC applied such adjustment by Appellant cannot be maintained. Lack of knowledge of initiation of CIRP would not be relevant. When CIRP was initiated, the Appellant Bank could not have adjusted the amounts as has been done in this matter. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
