Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyNovember 7, 2020Case LawsAT
Refund of amount which had been adjusted during CIRP by the Appellant Bank from Fixed Deposits - Once CIRP was initiated and Section 14 of IBC applied such adjustment by Appellant cannot be maintained. Lack of knowledge of initiation of CIRP would not be relevant. When CIRP was initiated, the Appellant Bank could not have adjusted the amounts as has been done in this matter. - AT
Refund of amount which had been adjusted during CIRP by the Appellant Bank from Fixed Deposits - Once CIRP was initiated and Section 14 of IBC applied such adjustment by Appellant cannot be maintained. Lack of knowledge of initiation of CIRP would not be relevant. When CIRP was initiated, the Appellant Bank could not have adjusted the amounts as has been done in this matter. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
