Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment u/s 153A - Need for spelling out ‘Satisfaction note’ - the ld. CIT(A) while adjudicating the legal issue of the validity of the satisfaction note prepared by the AO to invoke 153C against the assessee foundation, cannot resort to post mortem and resurrect a bad satisfaction note because AO could not have usurped the jurisdiction u/s 153C without preparing a valid Satisfaction Note and therefore AO’s action to invoke the jurisdiction u/s 153C in respect of AY 2014-15 was ab-initio void - AT
Assessment u/s 153A - Need for spelling out ‘Satisfaction note’ - the ld. CIT(A) while adjudicating the legal issue of the validity of the satisfaction note prepared by the AO to invoke 153C against the assessee foundation, cannot resort to post mortem and resurrect a bad satisfaction note because AO could not have usurped the jurisdiction u/s 153C without preparing a valid Satisfaction Note and therefore AO’s action to invoke the jurisdiction u/s 153C in respect of AY 2014-15 was ab-initio void - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.