Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Assessment u/s 153A - Need for spelling out ‘Satisfaction note’ - the ld. CIT(A) while adjudicating the legal issue of the validity of the satisfaction note prepared by the AO to invoke 153C against the assessee foundation, cannot resort to post mortem and resurrect a bad satisfaction note because AO could not have usurped the jurisdiction u/s 153C without preparing a valid Satisfaction Note and therefore AO’s action to invoke the jurisdiction u/s 153C in respect of AY 2014-15 was ab-initio void - AT
Assessment u/s 153A - Need for spelling out ‘Satisfaction note’ - the ld. CIT(A) while adjudicating the legal issue of the validity of the satisfaction note prepared by the AO to invoke 153C against the assessee foundation, cannot resort to post mortem and resurrect a bad satisfaction note because AO could not have usurped the jurisdiction u/s 153C without preparing a valid Satisfaction Note and therefore AO’s action to invoke the jurisdiction u/s 153C in respect of AY 2014-15 was ab-initio void - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.