Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - The inquiry made by the AO pertained to the issue as regards the valuation of opening and closing WIP of the assessee’s project and determination of the cost of sale of the same. - We are unable to comprehend as to on what basis it is canvassed by the ld. A.R that the A.O while framing the assessment, had queried, on the issue as to whether or not the ALV of the unsold flats was to be assessed under the head ‘house property’. - CIT had rightly invoked his jurisdiction under Sec. 263 of the Act and ‘set aside’ the assessment order with a direction to the A.O to pass a fresh order - AT
Revision u/s 263 - The inquiry made by the AO pertained to the issue as regards the valuation of opening and closing WIP of the assessee’s project and determination of the cost of sale of the same. - We are unable to comprehend as to on what basis it is canvassed by the ld. A.R that the A.O while framing the assessment, had queried, on the issue as to whether or not the ALV of the unsold flats was to be assessed under the head ‘house property’. - CIT had rightly invoked his jurisdiction under Sec. 263 of the Act and ‘set aside’ the assessment order with a direction to the A.O to pass a fresh order - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.