Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction u/s 10B - Here in the case in hand, the total income was first arrived at by the Revenue through the AO in the Assessment Order by computing the total income by way of brought forward or carry forward the depreciation allowance of the earlier AYs and set off the unabsorbed depreciation first and making the return Nil, thereby leaving the Assessee in a position where it could not claim any deduction u/s 10B as there was no income after set off of carry forward depreciation and unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years. - This method of computing the income is totally against the said law - HC
Deduction u/s 10B - Here in the case in hand, the total income was first arrived at by the Revenue through the AO in the Assessment Order by computing the total income by way of brought forward or carry forward the depreciation allowance of the earlier AYs and set off the unabsorbed depreciation first and making the return Nil, thereby leaving the Assessee in a position where it could not claim any deduction u/s 10B as there was no income after set off of carry forward depreciation and unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years. - This method of computing the income is totally against the said law - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.