Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Relief u/s 220(7) - Assessee in default for amount non received in India - From the perusal of the records it can be seen that the compensation is not coming under the purview of the business income as there was no business during the period. - Thus, compensation received in lieu of the losses of the contract which was supposed to be executed in the year 1991 will not form the receipt of revenue in nature, but capital in nature. - Since the amount is not taxable, the question of relief u/s 220(7) becomes redundant - AT
Relief u/s 220(7) - Assessee in default for amount non received in India - From the perusal of the records it can be seen that the compensation is not coming under the purview of the business income as there was no business during the period. - Thus, compensation received in lieu of the losses of the contract which was supposed to be executed in the year 1991 will not form the receipt of revenue in nature, but capital in nature. - Since the amount is not taxable, the question of relief u/s 220(7) becomes redundant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.