Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Relief u/s 220(7) - Assessee in default for amount non received in India - From the perusal of the records it can be seen that the compensation is not coming under the purview of the business income as there was no business during the period. - Thus, compensation received in lieu of the losses of the contract which was supposed to be executed in the year 1991 will not form the receipt of revenue in nature, but capital in nature. - Since the amount is not taxable, the question of relief u/s 220(7) becomes redundant - AT
Relief u/s 220(7) - Assessee in default for amount non received in India - From the perusal of the records it can be seen that the compensation is not coming under the purview of the business income as there was no business during the period. - Thus, compensation received in lieu of the losses of the contract which was supposed to be executed in the year 1991 will not form the receipt of revenue in nature, but capital in nature. - Since the amount is not taxable, the question of relief u/s 220(7) becomes redundant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
