Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Best judgment assessment u/s 62 of the CGST Act - contention of petitioner is that in view of the returns subsequently filed within the period permitted u/s 62, these assessment orders had to be withdrawn as contemplated under the said Section - The remedy of the petitioner against the said assessment orders lies in approaching the statutory appellate authority against the said orders - HC
Best judgment assessment u/s 62 of the CGST Act - contention of petitioner is that in view of the returns subsequently filed within the period permitted u/s 62, these assessment orders had to be withdrawn as contemplated under the said Section - The remedy of the petitioner against the said assessment orders lies in approaching the statutory appellate authority against the said orders - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.