Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only issued and served demand notice, but has also initiated the penalty proceedings. - no hesitation to hold that the proceedings, when the demand notice was issued and served upon the assessee and penalty proceedings were simultaneously initiated making all subsequent proceedings and orders non-est. - AT
Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only issued and served demand notice, but has also initiated the penalty proceedings. - no hesitation to hold that the proceedings, when the demand notice was issued and served upon the assessee and penalty proceedings were simultaneously initiated making all subsequent proceedings and orders non-est. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.