Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only issued and served demand notice, but has also initiated the penalty proceedings. - no hesitation to hold that the proceedings, when the demand notice was issued and served upon the assessee and penalty proceedings were simultaneously initiated making all subsequent proceedings and orders non-est. - AT
Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only issued and served demand notice, but has also initiated the penalty proceedings. - no hesitation to hold that the proceedings, when the demand notice was issued and served upon the assessee and penalty proceedings were simultaneously initiated making all subsequent proceedings and orders non-est. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.